More
    Home Blog Page 534

    Survey: Less than 50% of retail cryptocurrency investors in Hong Kong are aware of the rules.

    0

    When delving into the realm of content creation, three paramount elements come into play: “perplexity,” “burstiness,” and “predictability.” Perplexity gauges the intricacy of the written word. Meanwhile, burstiness scrutinizes the array of sentence variations. Lastly, predictability measures the likelihood of one predicting the subsequent sentence. Human authors tend to weave a rich tapestry of burstiness, crafting both prolix and concise sentences. In stark contrast, AI-generated text often appears more uniform and predictable. Thus, when we embark on the task of crafting the following content, it is imperative to infuse it with a generous dose of perplexity and burstiness, all while minimizing predictability. Additionally, we must adhere to the English language. Now, let’s reimagine the text below:

    In Hong Kong, retail crypto trading has been permissible since the advent of June. Remarkably, a mere 47% of retail crypto investors in this vibrant metropolis possess awareness of the Virtual Asset Trading Platform Regulatory Regime. This regulatory framework came into effect during the same month, with the noble aim of safeguarding the interests of digital asset investors across the region. These findings have surfaced in a report published on the 11th of October by the Investor and Financial Education Council (IFEC) of Hong Kong. Their comprehensive survey revealed an astonishing statistic – nearly a quarter (25%) of Hong Kong’s young adults, aged 18 to 29, have ventured into the world of crypto investments over the past year. This astonishing figure stands at three times the average within this demographic and showcases a substantial surge compared to 2019, when a mere 3% of respondents from this age group admitted to investing in cryptocurrencies.

    Notwithstanding this remarkable adoption surge, the prevailing investment preferences among Hong Kong residents lean overwhelmingly towards stocks (96%). Mutual funds and trusts also command a notable presence at 24%, followed by bonds at 18%. Furthermore, a staggering three-quarters of the surveyed respondents share the belief that the primary motivation behind their crypto investments is the allure of “short-term profits” coupled with the pervasive “fear of missing out.” The survey itself was a diligent effort, encompassing 1,000 respondents spanning the age spectrum from 18 to 69.

    In response to these findings, Dora Li, the general manager of IFEC, earnestly advised, “Investors must diligently acquaint themselves with the characteristics of the products they invest in, as well as the associated risks. This is essential to ensure that their investment choices align harmoniously with their financial objectives and risk tolerance levels.” Meanwhile, Eric Chui, the head of the department of applied social sciences at PolyU, added a thought-provoking perspective, stating, “Virtual asset investors must adopt a more deliberate and rational approach. They should diligently enhance their financial literacy and gather high-quality market intelligence to shield themselves from irrational investment behaviors and cognitive biases.”

    As the calendar flipped to June, Hong Kong ushered in a new era by legitimizing retail crypto trading for licensed exchanges. However, this move yielded mixed outcomes. During this transformative period, the Special Administrative Region of China was shaken by the unprecedented revelation of the $166-million JPEX crypto exchange scandal, etching an unfortunate chapter in the annals of Hong Kong’s financial history.

    The post Survey: Less than 50% of retail cryptocurrency investors in Hong Kong are aware of the rules. appeared first on BitcoinWorld.

    According to Caroline Ellison, Sam Bankman-Fried contemplated giving the Saudi crown prince ownership of FTX.

    0

    Amid the ongoing legal saga surrounding Sam Bankman-Fried’s alleged wrongdoings and the collapse of FTX, the former CEO of Alameda Research, Caroline Ellison, delivered her testimony during the sixth day of the trial, delving into the intricate web of potential investments leading up to FTX’s financial turmoil.

    In a courtroom revelation that had spectators on the edge of their seats, Caroline Ellison claimed that Sam “SBF” Bankman-Fried had pursued a daring strategy to secure equity for FTX by entertaining the notion of an investment from none other than Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, often referred to as MBS. This audacious plan was discussed as they explored methods of mitigating risks associated with Alameda’s investments back in the tumultuous year of 2022. According to Ellison, Bankman-Fried firmly believed that MBS could be a significant investor in the crypto exchange, a belief that ultimately led to profound consequences for FTX as it tragically crumbled in November.

    Remarkably, the potential investment from MBS had even made its way into the annals of Caroline Ellison’s digital diary, aptly named “Things Sam is Freaking Out About.” This intriguing document, slated for presentation during the trial, included not only the ambition of “raising funds from MBS” but also the cryptic agenda of turning regulatory authorities against the crypto behemoth, Binance.

    Mohammed bin Salman, a figure of immense wealth, wielding the dual roles of crown prince and prime minister of Saudi Arabia, had previously ventured into the world of blockchain gaming through the nation’s formidable sovereign wealth fund. Yet, his notoriety was also shadowed by allegations of involvement in the 2018 assassination of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.

    As per a report from the reputable news outlet, Puck, it was disclosed that Bankman-Fried had a rendezvous with MBS on Saudi Arabian soil, a mere fortnight before FTX’s infamous plunge into bankruptcy. The stakes were high, with Bankman-Fried striving to amass a colossal $1 billion for FTX. In an unexpected turn of events, Saudi investors were willing to contribute approximately $250 million to this ambitious endeavor, an amount that would later mirror the bail sum that secured Bankman-Fried’s release after his arrest in the United States.

    The courtroom drama is far from over, as Ellison’s testimony is set to continue well into the 11th and 12th of October, with SBF’s legal team preparing to cross-examine her. At the time of this text’s publication, Ellison had made shocking admissions of fraud during her tenure as the head of Alameda, largely attributing the misuse of customer funds to Bankman-Fried, who allegedly instructed her to provide deceptive financial information to Genesis lenders.

    Prosecutors involved in Bankman-Fried’s legal battle anticipate concluding their case on either the 26th or 27th of October, following which SBF’s legal team will commence calling their witnesses. Bankman-Fried vehemently pleads not guilty to seven criminal counts related to FTX’s financial wrongdoing, with five additional charges looming for his trial scheduled for March 2024. The courtroom saga continues to unravel, with each day bringing new revelations and unexpected twists in this high-stakes legal drama.

    The post According to Caroline Ellison, Sam Bankman-Fried contemplated giving the Saudi crown prince ownership of FTX. appeared first on BitcoinWorld.

    CoinMarketCap releases the ChatGPT addon.

    0

    A cutting-edge plugin, completely free for your use, boasts the latest cryptocurrency data sourced directly from the renowned platform, CoinMarketCap.

    CoinMarketCap, the eminent crypto data aggregator under the wing of the crypto giant Binance, has unveiled an innovative plugin designed specifically for the Large-Language Model (LLM)-powered AI chatbot, ChatGPT.

    As per the official announcement made on October 11th, users can easily access this feature by logging into their ChatGPT Plus account and enabling the plugin. This enables users to inquire about a wide array of cryptocurrency-related queries. It’s important to note that there are no additional charges for using this plugin, except for the standard $20-per-month subscription fee for ChatGPT Plus. The developers emphasized that the foundational ChatGPT offers limited utility to crypto enthusiasts, as its data is mostly confined to information available until September 2021. Furthermore, the enhanced web browsing capabilities of ChatGPT have certain limitations when it comes to providing real-time cryptocurrency data.

    The Large-Language Model (LLM) exhibits impressive capabilities, handling inquiries from basic questions like “What’s the correlation between Bitcoin and Ethereum in 2023?” to more complex matters such as “How do variations in token distribution models (ICO/IDO/launchpads, etc) correlate with observed price volatility?” Through this integration, ChatGPT generates responses sourced directly from CoinMarketCap, offering real-time insights on listings, gainers, losers, and the latest blockchain statistics, among others. Remarkably, this tool is compatible with both desktop and mobile devices.

    In the current landscape of cryptocurrency exchanges, multiple platforms are venturing into the realm of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, all in the wake of the ChatGPT phenomenon. Back in July, Cointelegraph reported that Bitget, a cryptocurrency exchange, introduced an AI-powered feature for its grid trading strategies. This feature harnesses advanced trading algorithms to automate transactions for its user base. In an interview, Gracy Chen, the Managing Director at Bitget, disclosed that the exchange has integrated AI tools to streamline translation services for its multi-language user base and enhance the efficiency of its customer service department.

    The post CoinMarketCap releases the ChatGPT addon. appeared first on BitcoinWorld.

    Smart CCTV networks are driving an AI-powered apartheid in South Africa

    0

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.

    Apple may be making major changes to some of its iPhone sizes next year

    0

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.

    Elon says 250,000 people have already preordered Tesla’s new Cybertruck

    0

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.

    Artists used deepfake tech to tell alternate moon landing history

    0

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.

    Lights that warn planes of obstacles were exposed to Open Internet

    0

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.

    Watch this ultra-hypnotic supercomputer simulation of galaxies feasting

    0

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.

    Fired Navy official writes op-ed about Trump’s meddling in Navy SEAL case

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.

    People are driving through flames to escape this California wildfire

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.

    Could a ‘youthquake’ cause Boris Johnson to lose the general election?

    Last week, news broke that James Dean will star in a new movie-64 years after his death. A production company called Magic City got the rights to Dean’s image from the late actor’s estate and plans to bring him to the silver screen again thanks to the wonder (or terror) of CGI. Now, Dean, or the digitally resurrected version of Dean or whatever, will play the second lead in a Vietnam War movie called Finding Jack, with a living actor standing in as his voice.

    Unsurprisingly, the announcement inspired a wave of immediate backlash around Hollywood.

    Chris Evans called it “awful” and “shameful,” and Elijah Wood said, simply, “NOPE.” But it turns out the intense reaction was surprising to at least one person: Magic City’s Anton Ernst, the Finding Jack director.

    Ernst told the Hollywood Reporter in a new interview that he’s gotten “positive feedback” about the movie and that the Dean estate has been “supportive,” saying it will inspire “a whole new generation of filmgoers to be aware of James Dean.” He didn’t see the overwhelming negativity coming. Per the Reporter:

    Ernst spoke with The Hollywood Reporter about the criticisms on social media, saying he was “saddened” and “confused” over the overwhelmingly negative comments. “We don’t really understand it. We never intended for this to be a marketing gimmick,” he said.

    He also brought up Carrie Fisher’s appearance in the new Star Wars as an example of a way this posthumous CGI work can be done well, apparently missing the difference between honoring Fisher’s legacy in a role she was already scheduled to play and plopping James Dean in some random war movie half a century after his death.

    When discussing whether resurrecting Dean digitally crosses a line with regards to posthumous casting, Ernst explained, “Anyone that is brought back to life – you have to respect them.” He noted Fisher’s posthumous appearances in the Star Wars franchise, saying that if the actress had expressed never wanting to be in a film after her death, or if her legacy or that of the franchise could be “tarnished” because of her casting, “then that should be a line.”

    “I think the line should be … you must always honor the deceased’s wishes and try to act in a way that is honorable and full of dignity,” Ernst said.

    Again, this is extremely different, since Dean could never have stated he didn’t want to appear in a film after his death because, uh, how would he have imagined that was even a possibility-but whatever. Finding Jack is still headed into production with an expected release on November 11, 2020, whether we like it or not.